Sign in or 

The purpose of the Social Enterprise Strategy is to capture the potential of the social enterprise sector, and focus the energies of the many resources available to impact on our economy, society and environment.
We have made this webspace because we would like you to share your input with us - so that the final strategy can build on as many ideas from as many different perspectives as possible.
We have started some conversations to help stimulate response and engagement. Please feel free to write openly, honestly and as much or as little as you wish. Don’t worry too much about the wording - it’s the ideas that matter and every contribution is as valuable as the next.
You can use this Overview page to navigate around the site and study the detail around each Strategic Priority before joining the relevant conversation.Within these conversations you can also see what other people are saying from other organisations and sectors citywide. Start by using the bullet points to click on the buttons that are most interesting and relevant to you.
Read the Invitation and Summary first • Click here for Background and Research• Make a general comment at the bottom of this page
Your contribution can help to build a lasting culture of social enterprise in Brighton and Hove.
• Do you have any general comments about the Strategic Summary and Invitation to Contribute? Start or join a conversation below.
How to Post Your Contribution1. To post your thoughts and ideas to these questions, simply click on 'Start a new thread' below. This thread is your response to our ideas, but can turn into a conversation of its own, as other visitors can reply to it.
2. You can also look at the threads of other visitors [all listed below], reply to them if you wish and click 'yes' or 'no' to let us know if you have found other threads valuable.
3. When you have finished adding your comments please continue to explore the site. You can return to this conversation at any time in the future and make additions by using the Navigation list in the top left of this window, or returning to the Overview page.
Olmaxwell |
Latest page update: made by Olmaxwell
, Mar 9 2008, 5:13 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by Olmaxwell
view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DaveAhlquist | 'Getting practical' | 0 | Mar 3 2008, 4:49 AM EST by DaveAhlquist | ||
|
Thread started: Mar 3 2008, 4:49 AM EST
Watch
Many of the examples of activities/ indicators on p.14 seem to reflect activity thats already within the remit of key parters. I there an opprtunity here to spell out roles and (perhaps sometimes challenging) targets for wider partners?
|
|||||
| DaveAhlquist | Regional & national perspectives | 0 | Mar 3 2008, 4:43 AM EST by DaveAhlquist | ||
|
Thread started: Mar 3 2008, 4:43 AM EST
Watch
• I’m not sure about the SEEDA reference (p4.). This, I think, has been taken from the 2005 enabling framework. The situation now is a bit more complex – including a lot more emphasis on ‘mainstreaming the third sector’. The question is whether you leave what you’ve got - with its broad optimistic take – or attempt a more defined analysis of the current situation.
• I think it would be good to see a robust two way conversation with the regional agenda which could both expand on B & H’s strengths – e.g. good practice in private sector engagement (firmly on the national and regional to do list) , suggest markets for expansion – e.g. renewables, and emphasise place making e.g. B&H at the core of coastal regeneration • Obviously from my perspective it would be nice to see mention of the se2partnership/ Social Enterprise South East! • A more structured look at business opportunities may also be useful in terms of fit with regional strategy. I think we (se2partnership) will be trying to encourage a sector focus: Culture, Housing, Rural, environmental, Health/social care, regeneration. • Should procurement be in there more explicitly? |
|||||
| DaveAhlquist | Stakeholders not Shareholders? | 0 | Mar 3 2008, 4:42 AM EST by DaveAhlquist | ||
|
Thread started: Mar 3 2008, 4:42 AM EST
Watch
On p. 6 you say stakeholders, not shareholders. Do you really mean that? I’m thinking of business models increasingly coming in – under a CIC for example, or community share issues for wind farms, or Ethical Property Company right there in B&H all where shareholders are part of the mix.
|
|||||